On the 1st of May 2019, coincidentally my birthday, the IAAF announced new rules that require hyper androgynous (women with naturally high levels of testosterone) athletes to take medication to lower their testosterone levels in order to compete in the 400m, 800m and 1500m. Essentially what this means is that Caster Semenya (born female with naturally high testosterone levels) who has been at the centre of invasive gender speculation for her entire sporting career spanning 10 years can no longer compete unless she is willing to take drugs to reduce her testosterone levels. Understandably, and rightly so, for her, it is non-negotiable. Her sporting career is over.
For me the decision was just heart breaking, as a woman, as a black woman. Honestly reading the story just made me feel like all the air got taken out of me. When decisions like this are made, I feel weak, powerless. If someone as strong as Caster cannot beat them, then what hope is there for the rest of us? And I’m not talking about her physical strength, but her grit and determination; the kind of strength it takes to have to ‘show you’re a girl’ to your doubters from childhood, and then being expected to do it all the way into adulthood. Nothing is on ‘show’ now except the innermost private details of her body that she does not owe anyone an explanation for, put on display, and then even worse, debated on, with the whole world as her audience. As if her body is an object that they can’t decide the colour of, so they ask each other what to do with it? There is only one answer to this question that should never have been asked. Nothing. It’s HER body, it’s the way she was BORN. And that should be the end of the matter. Yet in 2019, apparently the bodies of black women are still nothing more than objects to be taken possession of, and its apparently totally okay for some random board of probably white people to decide what happens to her body when the only person with executive rights over her body should be Caster.
And yes, this is an issue about race because of Sara Baartman, because of Serena (who it seems rarely ever actually gets spoken about for her tennis) because being a black woman means that inevitably at some point in your life you will either be masculinised, hyper-sexualised or fetishised. Because our Western society with a Eurocentric view of what a woman’s body should be like sees the body of a black woman as ‘other’. Because there is a masculinity bias and the black female body is more likely to be seen as masculine by default. There have most definitely been other women with ‘intersex’ traits in Olympic sport before but why didn’t we hear about them? Because there is a different line for ‘masculine’ with black and non black women and a non-black woman with ‘intersex’ traits might just about get looked at twice, but there would be no investigation. It would end there.
I understand how the other athletes feel, it’s not nice to lose to someone who is better than you – but their treatment of her? Unacceptable. Where is the investigation into the bullying and vitriol Caster has had to deal with throughout her sporting career? Frankly, for her competitors to act as though she has an unfair advantage is outrageous and is nothing more than throwing a tantrum! That’s what the Olympics is! Its not a fair game by any standard. It’s a game for the people on the extreme end of the normal bell curve, THAT’S what it takes to get gold, by being extremely different to everyone else in a way that makes them especially adapted for their sport!
And while this is lauded in men such as Bolt and Phelps who are praised for being ‘freaks of nature’ and given gold medal after gold medal, the same rules do not apply for a black woman who is actually not that drastically different physically to her fellow competitors and who does not have an extremely large victory margin over her competitors. Unlike Bolt who had such a great victory margin that he literally watched his competitors eat his dust as he crossed the finish line. Where was the fuss then? Is a 6’7 man who can run way faster than men of his height usually can or ‘should’ be able to, running against men up to a foot shorter than him more fair? If Phelps was still competing would they make him take injections of lactic acid before his races to ‘even out the playing field’? Is there a cap to the testosterone level of men before they need to start doping to be allowed to compete? People didn’t care about ‘fairness’ then so why has Caster been singled out? To say that the only way she’ll be allowed to compete is if she starts doping in a sport where doping is illegal is just the height of hypocrisy! What this ruling says to me is ‘this is our game, and you can only play by our rules – which are subject to our (biased) feelings – or not at all’, and a committee with no real standard and fluctuating rules on a case by case basis is not a fairness committee at all. They should either investigate everyone and take away everyone’s ‘unfair advantages’ or investigate no one at all. Of course, they wouldn’t do that because the performance level at the olympics would drastically drop, and most of the top performing athletes would either be eliminated or have to undergo forced doping.
The final sting is that by settling on the ruling they did, the IAAF are suggesting that the only thing that got Caster to where she is her higher than ‘usual’ testosterone. Suggesting that any single woman with intersex traits (naturally high testosterone levels) in the world can become not just an Olympian but a gold medalist for 10 years running! That shit takes graft! And dedication! And true excellence and it’s not all to do with her hormones! Her hormones aren’t what made Caster Semenya a gold medal winning Olympian, she carved herself into one with discipline, hard training regimes, strict nutrition and all whilst fighting the world. THAT is laudable. That is inspirational. Caster Semenya, YOU are inspirational, thank you for fighting the world and being stronger than I could ever be.